Talk to Expert

Fraud Detection Model: Detect anomalies by red-flagging fraudulent or out of sequence transactions

713

Of your peers have already read this article.


Minutes time you’ll spend for this story!


The problem

The compliance and audit team of a leading finance enterprise is responsible for monitoring, validating, and book-keeping of all ledger transactions every quarter. The current manual process and rule engine is a tedious and time-consuming process needing a major overhaul in the system. Considering transaction volume across verticals, the team wanted to know if Cognitive BI can come up with an innovative analytical tool to flag these non-conformances as violations and raise red flags as necessary.

The cognitive solution

The challenge to be able to carry out the detection is twofold:

1. Log analyzer

  • Extract ledger transactional logs from the log file on a daily bases
  • Build out a graphical structure of the processes and record tabular metrics on time taken for closure, approvals by roles per account type
  • Use this metadata as a new log audit table and textual notes from ledger evaluation as unstructured data per account

2. Anomaly detector

  • Using the metadata generated and sparse matrices from textual notes, a fraud classifier was developed.
  • The tree-based model acts as an automated data-driven set of a rules engine

2. Business rules

  • Custom business rules are used as part of the rule engine to work on top of the identified frauds and reduce false positives
  • The two-stage design reduces multiple redundant review and control volume of false positives and false negatives

Key insights

The deployed solution was able to automatically detect anomalies by red-flagging fraudulent or out of sequence transactions. With an overall reduction of 30% in fraudulent misses, some interesting insights came into business allowing them to tweak certain operational procedures.

Latest & Popular Stories